Home

ecospace traction w/KMC831 controler no fire svc

Posted By: Take the stairs

ecospace traction w/KMC831 controler no fire svc - 03/30/12 04:15 AM

I have never worked on a kone ecospace, or this controler we just picked up 17 elevators at a job, and this thing. The first problem is I have is no fire svc. When I first saw the job the fire svc hall switch was in the on position, and just running like normal. None of the fire svc key switches do anything. I think they have them for looks. Is this programed in to the controler, or maybe its turned off? Also if you have any general info on these corks, ect.... Thanks any helps appreciated. Don't you wish that sales people would let you survey jobs before they sign svc contracts?
Posted By: GreenPants

Re: ecospace traction w/KMC831 controler no fire svc - 03/30/12 04:25 AM

LOL like what we see in a survey makes a difference. the higher ups just see $$$. unfortunately a lot of times the $$$ goes back into the units. its job security.
Posted By: Vic

Re: ecospace traction w/KMC831 controler no fire svc - 03/30/12 05:35 AM

Did you ask your boss?
Posted By: Smitty

Re: ecospace traction w/KMC831 controler no fire svc - 03/30/12 12:17 PM

Can you find out from the building engineer how it has managed pass an inspection? We have a few "coffee shop" inspectors where I work too. I would imagine that the key switch probably is not wired or wired wrong and the smoke detector inputs are jumped out. Sales people never make mistakes lol. After all, if it has the company name on the car sill then that it is all they need to know ...right.
Posted By: Vatorman15

Re: ecospace traction w/KMC831 controler no fire svc - 03/30/12 01:38 PM

Check parameter 1-62. fire service on is 1. off is 0.
Posted By: Take the stairs

Re: ecospace traction w/KMC831 controler no fire svc - 03/31/12 01:44 AM

Thanks Vatorman15 they were closed today I will try that on monday. I am afraid to ask the building engineer anything until its fixed. I would prefer him not to know. Vic the conversation with my boss started off with me saying what the hell! But If everything was easy to fix we would be out of a job. Thanks guys
enjoy your weekend.
Posted By: chitownslick

Re: ecospace traction w/KMC831 controler no fire svc - 04/03/12 04:33 PM

There is also parameter 7-38 for the smoke detectors 1-0n 0-off. Sometimes when people are having trouble with the smokes the turn off fire service at 1-62
Posted By: jkh

Re: ecospace traction w/KMC831 controler no fire svc - 04/03/12 09:40 PM

Chitown
Sounds like the perfect topic for our next safety meeting! I would hope that we as responsible professionals would see the potential danger of that choice!
Posted By: Broke_Sheave

Re: ecospace traction w/KMC831 controler no fire svc - 04/04/12 08:56 PM

I would imagine it works and as has been suggested, a parameter has been turned off. A lot of that junk goes on nowadays when a company loses a contract. Parameters get changed, prints disappear, etc, etc..

I don't get it, but it happens every day.
Posted By: Take the stairs

Re: ecospace traction w/KMC831 controler no fire svc - 04/05/12 03:46 AM

update...........it was not a parameter change. 1-62 is set to 1 and 7-38 is 1. There is no voltage to the fire srv key switches I had to leave again. I am going to start tracing out the circut, hopfully it just a loose plug.

Thanks,
eric
Posted By: theshaft

Re: ecospace traction w/KMC831 controler no fire svc - 04/17/12 05:51 AM

There will not be its referanced to ground through the lcehas board in the shaft sent to the controller through the network
Posted By: aquadag

Re: ecospace traction w/KMC831 controler no fire svc - 04/19/12 02:36 AM

try a lon upload sometimes the keyswitches are on boards and these are serial linked, Kone will sabotage, an upload will sync everything
Posted By: Vic

Re: ecospace traction w/KMC831 controler no fire svc - 04/19/12 09:15 PM

There was a Kone job in California that was running, being serviced by an independendt elevator company. Then two representatives from Kone showed up on the job. The next thing that happened im chronology is that some encoder wires got swapped, and the unit can't run at all like that. The independent service company swapped the wires back, and the unit ran once again. I'm not making any allegations here, just relating story the way I heard it from the mechanic
Posted By: theshaft

Re: ecospace traction w/KMC831 controler no fire svc - 05/02/12 05:10 AM

If the boar was bad you would get a 1401 1402 or what ever floor control board it was in the shaft usually the print will show you the pin count to trouble shoot it
Posted By: Take the stairs

Re: ecospace traction w/KMC831 controler no fire svc - 05/04/12 05:17 AM

UPDATE>>>>>>>
The recall now works, and fire srv works if I turn it on from the controller, the key switches both go into a serial link board, ordered, going to replace will report back

Thanks guys

P.S. What is a lon upload? How is it done?
Posted By: Broke_Sheave

Re: ecospace traction w/KMC831 controler no fire svc - 05/04/12 07:44 PM

Originally Posted By: Take the stairs
UPDATE>>>>>>>
The recall now works, and fire srv works if I turn it on from the controller, the key switches both go into a serial link board, ordered, going to replace will report back

Thanks guys

P.S. What is a lon upload? How is it done?


This is what a LON is..
http://www.echelon.com/technology/lonworks/
Posted By: Vic

Re: ecospace traction w/KMC831 controler no fire svc - 05/05/12 01:41 AM

Wow, thanks, Broke Sheave!

As the immortal Johnny Carson used to say, "I did not know that"!
Posted By: Broke_Sheave

Re: ecospace traction w/KMC831 controler no fire svc - 05/05/12 03:30 AM

Originally Posted By: Vic
Wow, thanks, Broke Sheave!

As the immortal Johnny Carson used to say, "I did not know that"!


Yep...Echelon is sitting on a gold mine. And evertime a system is sold Echelon is paid a licensing fee. The vendors they buy from do not own the technology. They merely license it from Echelon...At least that's my understanding...

Wiki here..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LonWorks

Which may explain why a lot of manufacutrers are going to the CAN networks. Not only does it seem more robust than LON, but as to my understanding there is no licensing fee. Anybody can manufacture a CAN network, and devices as long as it conforms to ISO 11898-1 standards..

Wiki below..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAN_bus
Posted By: Vic

Re: ecospace traction w/KMC831 controler no fire svc - 05/05/12 05:35 AM

Hmm, I've been working a bit with both of those, (Kone kcm831 and MCE 2000/4000), but never really understood the differences. I know a little bit more now. Cool, thanks!
Posted By: uppo72

Re: ecospace traction w/KMC831 controler no fire svc - 05/05/12 12:31 PM

Originally Posted By: Broke_Sheave
Originally Posted By: Vic
Wow, thanks, Broke Sheave!

As the immortal Johnny Carson used to say, "I did not know that"!


Yep...Echelon is sitting on a gold mine. And evertime a system is sold Echelon is paid a licensing fee. The vendors they buy from do not own the technology. They merely license it from Echelon...At least that's my understanding...

Wiki here..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LonWorks

Which may explain why a lot of manufacutrers are going to the CAN networks. Not only does it seem more robust than LON, but as to my understanding there is no licensing fee. Anybody can manufacture a CAN network, and devices as long as it conforms to ISO 11898-1 standards..

Wiki below..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAN_bus


how is a can bus system different than a multiplexing system if it is? i get the impression the it is effectively the same with hexidecimal addresses for the buttons ect...
Posted By: Broke_Sheave

Re: ecospace traction w/KMC831 controler no fire svc - 05/05/12 01:46 PM

Originally Posted By: uppo72
Originally Posted By: Broke_Sheave
Originally Posted By: Vic
Wow, thanks, Broke Sheave!

As the immortal Johnny Carson used to say, "I did not know that"!


Yep...Echelon is sitting on a gold mine. And evertime a system is sold Echelon is paid a licensing fee. The vendors they buy from do not own the technology. They merely license it from Echelon...At least that's my understanding...

Wiki here..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LonWorks

Which may explain why a lot of manufacutrers are going to the CAN networks. Not only does it seem more robust than LON, but as to my understanding there is no licensing fee. Anybody can manufacture a CAN network, and devices as long as it conforms to ISO 11898-1 standards..

Wiki below..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAN_bus


how is a can bus system different than a multiplexing system if it is? i get the impression the it is effectively the same with hexidecimal addresses for the buttons ect...


Multiplexing???

Like the RS boards on otis, the 4 bit mics on fujitechs, the floor control boards on Schindler???

If that's what you're talking about basically not much. The deal with these CAN and LON networks, is that you can purchase them off the shelf rather than have to invent your own, in house...

At least that's what I think you're talking about.
Posted By: theshaft

Re: ecospace traction w/KMC831 controler no fire svc - 05/07/12 02:24 AM

Go to menu 5 submenu 7 change the 0 to a 1 hit accept let it do its thing when cpu say 5-7-1 cycle power then your done
© 2024 Elevator Forum