My statement and belief that Mr. Studders displayed a lack of etiquette when using Mr. Linn's trade journal article in the manner in which he did on the elevatorworld dot com forum is my opinion -- and I stand by it.
To classify my statement as a "personal attack" and "flaming" is ridiculous.
..
doggie.
I respect your right to argue your point but, please define forum etiquette? I have pretty much read just about every rule that there has been published for forums, and so far I have never seen anything that may suggest that I have broken forum etiquette in any shape or form.
Relax about the flamming issues, forums can raise one's opinions to a point where individuals can take offence. This is the problem with the printed word, we cannot see a facail expression so it is easy to lose sight of what was being, attempted to be articulated.
Another point is that I have no agenda of any kind, I do not say my forums are better than all others etc, or that I am anti-union. If I thought this I would never be a member of other forums & would never have so many union friends.
I thank all for the kind words however, I also stand by my statement that if a person publishes an article in any publication, private or not; you have to expect that your article is then open to review and debate by anyone who gets to read the said article. If you do not want or cannot accept negative argument on a published article, then the only answer is "Do not publish your opinions".
I'm not crying over your negative feedback to my comment or my methods. I have only two things that I reserve and they are: - The Right of Free Speech, without personal attack & the right of Freedom.
Now you have my opinions and my thoughts, I would like your opinion as to how or why I have broken forum etiquette?
The administrators of EW I suspect would have deleted my post if, they believed like you that I had broken forum etiquette. Further, any moderator / administrator of vatortrader I suspect would have issued me a warning or deleted my posts if they felt I have broken forum etiquette.
Are you entirely sure that in this instance, your personal relationship with the author has not clouded your judgement? Please do not see this as an offensive comment, i'm just trying to get an understanding of your point of view in respect of forums etiquette & where this is published? or is it purley a personal point of view. Again I respect your right to a personal point of view.
"If I may so that everyone knows exactly the contents of the said article, I have copied it below"
The following has been passed to me, and I just don't see the argument other than eliteist protectionism for union members. Strange really I always though America was the land of the free? It would appear others disagree.
I have found several Internet sites where they
welcome elevator personnel, also building maintenance
men, building managers, contractors, and
owners. It's a great idea and one we really need in our
industry but it should be restricted to only IUEC
members where only union members could access it.
Is anyone else worried about who is reading these
forums? Why hire a union constructor if this type of
experience and knowledge is readily available to anyone
who comes looking, including non-union and
building maintenance men? I've read some of these
forums. Those who have posted are well informed
and most likely union members providing the critical
information. They are well intentioned but definitely
not helping the industry. I would recommend that
none of our members provide information to any of
these types of sites.
However,
if any of these websites change their
format to provide a secure union-member-only
forum online then I would be the first to recommend
it. Providing a forum or site where ONLY union elevator
constructors could enter to discuss with other
union members specific questions, problems and
solutions, and share their knowledge would be a natural
progression of our industry into the future.
Verifying union membership might be a problem
though. Who would have a list of active members
from one month to the next? So I guess what I arn
saying is if it's not a union site then don't supply any
information. It's a shame our union couldn't be the
one to provide and control it for us but I understand
... too many lawyers.
Opposing views are good ... email me!
Jim Linn
Journal@IUEC12.Com
I believe such a view would also mean an end to This forum as well as all other elevator forums if this chap has his way.
However, I for one believe in freedom of speech and Jim has every right to express his views. In fact I have gone one step further and have done exactly what Jim has asked for. I have created a seperate forum where access will be given to Union members only. No other members of my forums other than moderators can actually see this forum but, by the same token no future member of the union only forum will see any of my other forums. I would call that fair?
I have invited Jim to join his union only forum but sadly I have to say so far only Silence.
If Jim has his way then these forums and all others would be for union members only. I have no issues at all with any unions but, you have to have the choice of opting out of them it you feel it is not right for you, without fear of any form of discrimmination.
Regards,
Francis S. Studders