Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 8 guests, and 0 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
April
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30
Newest Members
Prairieelevator, Robot Rob, Montkone, Jevans, Clayshooter
8395 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums13
Topics6,494
Posts36,781
Members8,395
Most Online117
Jan 16th, 2020
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#29246 - 05/07/20 08:21 PM 2.22.3.2.1 spring buffers vs 3.22.1.2.1  
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 1
YYZConsult Offline
stranger
YYZConsult  Offline
stranger

Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 1
Ontario
Does anyone know why the criteria for spring buffers for traction elevators has a different acceptable range than spring buffers for hydraulic elevators?
Traction require 3x the gross load to compress solid, and a minimum of 2x; where hydraulic buffers max load rating is 2x the gross load to compress and minimum of 1x.
Rack and pinion devices also utilize the traction criteria for spring buffers.

#29257 - 05/08/20 09:37 PM Re: 2.22.3.2.1 spring buffers vs 3.22.1.2.1 [Re: YYZConsult]  
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 759
john jay Offline
old hand
john jay  Offline
old hand

Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 759
ohio
A17.1-2016-8.2.3.2, gives the formula for spring buffers. I would guess the difference between the safety plank construction, and the construction of the bolster channel may have somehing to do with the different critera.


Photo Gallery
PECCO PH5000 Overspeed Governor
Drive sheave
The best helper.
Rotary Oildraulic
Old Otis badge.
Brakes,Coil,Rotor
KONE MX10 repair tool kit
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.029s Queries: 15 (0.010s) Memory: 2.6521 MB (Peak: 2.7852 MB) Zlib disabled. Server Time: 2024-04-18 22:57:23 UTC