|
0 members (),
23
guests, and
2
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums13
Topics7,385
Posts40,939
Members10,040
| |
Most Online3,137 Apr 9th, 2026
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 3
stranger
|
|
stranger
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 3 |
Indirtwetrust I cannot thank you enough! just to reconfirm we did not have the first 8 iOS or reduced stroke buffers so we went ahead with the next step and confirmed we did seem to have bad data in the DSP for the ETS tables. because after the power cycles and commands and backup scan we are back up to contract speed of 350. Not sure how we initially corrupted the data files in the DSP but I will say we did measure a quick spike of 350mv AC between V+ to VC during a run.
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Tac 50- fault 106, 53, 981
|
TCElevator2
|
04/19/19 01:43 AM
|
Re: Tac 50- fault 106, 53, 981
|
TCElevator
|
04/19/19 02:20 AM
|
Re: Tac 50- fault 106, 53, 981
|
jkh
|
04/19/19 11:51 AM
|
Re: Tac 50- fault 106, 53, 981
|
TC7
|
04/19/19 04:12 PM
|
Re: Tac 50- fault 106, 53, 981
|
boomer
|
04/20/19 03:08 AM
|
Re: Tac 50- fault 106, 53, 981
|
TCElevator
|
04/20/19 03:18 AM
|
Re: Tac 50- fault 106, 53, 981
|
TCElevator
|
04/20/19 03:26 PM
|
Re: Tac 50- fault 106, 53, 981
|
TCElevator
|
04/20/19 03:57 PM
|
Re: Tac 50- fault 106, 53, 981
|
Indirtwetrust
|
04/20/19 05:23 PM
|
Re: Tac 50- fault 106, 53, 981
|
TCElevator
|
04/21/19 08:08 PM
|
Re: Tac 50- fault 106, 53, 981
|
Indirtwetrust
|
04/21/19 09:21 PM
|
Re: Tac 50- fault 106, 53, 981
|
TCElevator
|
04/21/19 11:00 PM
|
Re: Tac 50- fault 106, 53, 981
|
TCElevator2
|
04/22/19 01:25 PM
|
Re: Tac 50- fault 106, 53, 981
|
Indirtwetrust
|
04/22/19 10:21 PM
|
Re: Tac 50- fault 106, 53, 981
|
TCElevator2
|
04/23/19 01:06 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HW PM
by Chris, January 13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|