Well considering based on the Name and Picture, that the poster above is one of the Owners of Smart rise, I could see why he would feel that way.
But what I do not see is how exactly does the legacy controller meet the code? Based on the Bulletin looks like the DZ Sensor was the device used for Unintended Car Movement. Which doesn't meet the code. Please enlighten us, on how exactly compliance is being achieved? Sorry I'm not gonna take your word for it when the safety of me and my crew are at risk!
2.19.2
...
(-b) any of the following shall not render the detection
means inoperative:
(-1) the occurrence of a single ground fault
(-2) the failure of any mechanically operated switch that does not meet the requirements of 2.26.4.3.1
(-3) the failure of any single magnetically operated
switch, contactor, or relay
(-4) the failure of any single solid-state device the failure of a software system not
conforming to 2.26.4.3.2
(2) The failure of any single mechanically operated
switch that does not meet the requirements of 2.26.4.3
shall not render the detection means inoperative.
